Abdouraman Hamadou Babba |
- Abdouraman Hamadou Babba
The president of EtoileFilante of Garoua
recently scored a major victory in his desperate fight to reform Cameroon
football when the National Olympics Committee annulled the statutes of the
Cameroon Football Federation (Fecafoot), in accordance with his petition which
he deposited at the said Committee in August this year. He is now determined to
have the entire electoral process, which saw the election of Tombi à Roko as
president of Fecafoot, cancelled. Abdouraman made this and other pertinent
disclosures relating to Cameroon football clear in an interview he granted the
press recently.
How
did you receive the decision of the Chamber of Arbitration of the National
Olympics Committee annulling the statutes of Fecafoot?
I
received the decision with a lot of relief. All the actors of our football knew
that those statutes violated article 23 of the law which has to do with the
federal electoral college. The fact that the highest decision-making body of
our country in terms of sports has said it comforts us; it shows that the
Normalisation Committee did not do its job in an impartial manner.
The president of the National Olympics
Committee, HamadKalkabaMalboum, said this decision of the Chamber of
Arbitration did not annul the election which saw the victory of Tombi à Roko.
How do you comment on that?
He is right. Our petition deposited on 25
August 2015 aimed particularly at the cancellation of the statutes drawn up by
the Normalisation Committee and adopted on 5 September 2015, insofar as the
electoral process had not yet begun on that date. The very next day after the cancellation was
pronounced on 1 October 2015 and in conformity with article 33 of the code of
the Chamber of Arbitration, which states that the decision was effective as
from the time of its pronouncement, I deposited a new petition aimed this time
at the cancellation of the entire electoral process carried out on the basis of
those statutes judged illegal and which had been annulled.
If
the Chamber of Arbitration does not annul this election as you wish, what
should we expect in the days ahead?
I
would immediately lodge an appeal at the arbitration tribunal in Lausanne,
Switzerland. To me, the national chamber of arbitration is only a stopover on
the road to the Swiss arbitration tribunal.
Some
people are of the opinion that seizing the Swiss arbitration tribunal would not
yield fruit, given that EssombaEyenga, the main maoeuvrer at this international
court, is no longer on your side. Is this your feeling?
If you really knew what the Swiss
arbitration tribunal represented in the international sporting environment, you
would not give any credit to such a declaration.
Why
did you refuse to adhere to the “consensus” that was negotiated by the Prime
Minister, whereas many of your former partisans have accepted to move on?
I
have the strong conviction that the consensus did not take into account the
vital interests of our football. It simply took into account individual
preoccupations. The engagement I’m taking for our football is sincere and it
aims essentially to deeply restructure football in the country. It is an ideal
that is grossly placed above my personal interests.
Do
you not feel betrayed by your former partners?
Not
at all! Everyone is free to make their choice. I understand and accept theirs,
and I hope they too have understood and accepted my choice of not accepting the
consensus and of continuing the quest for the ideal I just talked about.
Under
what conditions would you accept to abandon this eternal fight against the
leaders of Fecafoot?
I’ll
stop on the day football actors in Cameroon will have the right and liberty to
designate their leaders in all transparency. It is an indispensable condition
for the development and blossoming of our football. For decades now, we are in
a system whereby the president chooses his voters whereas it is supposed to be
the contrary. One of the major consequences of this situation is that we find
in the football governing body a great majority of persons who have no direct
interest in football and who are happy with the little advantages they have,
without paying attention to the smooth-functioning of our football.
In
his post-election speech, Tombi à Roko stretched his hand “to all actors who
did not find themselves in the executive bureau.” In your capacity as football
actor and club president, would you accept to collaborate with him if he called
for you tomorrow?
If
Mr. Tombi emerges victorious after a legal, credible and equitable electoral
process, why will I not join him? In this case he would be the choice of the
majority of actors, which unfortunately is not the case presently. He was
imposed on the helm of our federation by Fifa and the Normalisation Committee,
just to preserve a certain number of shameful interests. Because he is
illegitimate to me, I’ll use every legal means possible to invalidate the
(electoral) process, in order to help move our football forward.
Is
the Head of Government Philemon Yang’s written congratulation to the new
leaders of Fecafoot not enough proof that the state has decided to put an end
to this conflict which has dragged on for too long?
This
letter came before the cancellation of the statutes of Fecafoot which were
judged to be against the laws governing our football. I’m sure the
congratulation letter would never have been sent if the decision of the
arbitration chamber had been pronounced earlier. The government is the
guarantor of respect for legality and I don’t see its head encouraging the
violation of a law adopted at the National Assembly and promulgated by the Head
of State.
What
is your reaction to those who think that you are now acting against the
interests of the state whose laws you however claim to defend?
I
think we should not mistake the interests of the state with those of some
individuals, be they high state functionaries. State interest lies mainly in
the respect for its institutions. If in the name of whatever interest everybody
violated the law, it would be chaos. Only the President of the Republic is the
judge of this kind of opportunity in circumstances clearly specified by our
constitution.
Some
people hold that, in reality, your desperate fight against the leaders of
Fecafoot has one goal: getting the post
of secretary-general of the federation whose call for candidature has just been
launched by Tombi à Roko.
If
that was the case, I would have long had that post with many things…But let me
repeat for the umpteenth time that I don’t sell my conscience.
Why
do you refuse to put down your arms and work with this new Fecafoot executive,
which would mean putting an end to this battle?
Let’s
be clear: I’ve never been against the idea of a consensus that would take into
consideration the interests of our football. And then, a consensus can be done
in respect of legality. I would even say that it is one of the indispensable
conditions of having a solid and viable consensus.
A
few minutes after the announcement of the decision of the Chamber of
Arbitration, Joseph Antoine Bell jubilated by publishing on his facebook wall:
“all what was done from these texts has been cancelled. We have to begin from
scratch. Let’s be hopeful!” Should we expect a new alliance between the two of
you in the days ahead?
I’ve
always been in contact with Joseph Antoine Bell and we share many convictions
concerning the future of our football.
If
it is within the framework of a credible and equitable process, why not? But I
must assure you straight away that I’m not inhabited by the morbid obsession of
becoming president of Fecafoot at all cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment