Military Judge to Decide Mancho Bibixy’s Fate Next Week
-Several Anglophone activists already slammed heavy jail
terms
By Innocent Kum in Yaounde
Penn Terence slammed 12 years in jail by the military judge |
At least four Anglophone activists who for months have
been held at the Yaounde Kondengui Maximum security prison were last week
handed heavy jail terms by the Yaounde military tribunal.
While
Terence Penn Khan who was charged with terrorism, secession, group rebellion
and incitement to civil war was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and a fine
of 5 million FCFA, Che Benjamin and Ambeizi Andrew were each handed 11-year
jail terms during the a lengthy court
session Tuesday, April 10.
On
Friday, April 13, yet another Anglophone activist, Ngalim Felix, who was
arrested amidst the ongoing socio-political tension in the North West and South
West regions, was slammed an 11 year jail term by the military judge.
However,
Coffin revolutionist, Mancho Bibixy who appeared in court same day had his case
adjourned to April 24. It is most likely that his fate just like that of other
Anglophone detainees who are being jointly tried will be decided same day.
Sentencing
Penn Terrence earlier on Tuesday, the Judge of the Yaounde military court said
he found him guilty of several counts including notably complicity to
secession, complicity in financing terrorism, hostility to the fatherland and
complicity to incite rebellion.
Before
listening to the judge’s verdict, Penn Terence told the court that political
decisions and not court sentences will resolve the socio-political tensions in
the North West and South West regions.
In a
letter he read out before judges at the military tribunal, Penn, a trained
school teacher who was vice principal of CCAST Bambili, told the court: “Dear
Madam President and Government Commissioner (Prosecutor) of this Tribunal, as
this process draws to its end, I think it is time for me to give my final word
before you pass your long-awaited judgment……The abduction, incarceration and
trial that I have been subjected to before this Tribunal is political and
challenges the foundational basis of this country-Cameroon. Trial of civilians
by military tribunals contravenes the right to a fair trial by a competent, independent
and impartial court. Not being a member of the army or the owner of any
military weapon, this trial has violated all my rights as guaranteed by the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1945), the UN International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights
and even the fundamental rights to a fair trial as laid down in the preamble of
the 1996 constitution of the Republic of Cameroon. I wish to emphasis that this
trial has been illegal from the start. How else do you explain the fact that I
was illegally abducted in Bamenda since January 16, 2017 for acts allegedly
committed there but put on trial before a military tribunal in Yaounde instead
of Bamenda? How do you explain the fact that throughout the trial, this court
has shamelessly acted as Prosecutor and Judge at the same time? No fair-minded
person can expect justice from this type of charade trial. The Anglo-Saxon system of criminal
justice that is supposed to be applied in the English- speaking North West and
South West regions of this country demands that justice is not only done but
seen to be done. Those are the principles for which I am prepared, if need be,
to pay the ultimate price. The charges against my person have all been trumped
up with the court presenting no proof to any of the charges, the reason being
that they do not exist. I am neither a terrorist nor a secessionist but the
political nature of the trial makes it possible for the court to slam the
“Guilty Verdict” on me. If the term or word ‘terrorism’ is an attribute to
people and individuals who decry societal injustice and inequality, then find
me guilty again because these are the reasons for which I stand before you
today. No tribunal including the one over which you preside can solve the
‘Anglophone problem’ in this country because it is political. It requires more
of a political will rather than court cases to see it through. That is why the
United Nations, the African Union and other international organisations have consistently
advised the government country to address the root cause if she wants to solve
the political imbroglio facing the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment