By a reporter in Bamenda with agency
reports
Not all children on the street are street children |
Michelle
has however admitted holding 21 kids but said they are “Street Children”.
Records from the Ministry of Social Affairs show that there are no street
children in Bamenda.
Earlier
reports in The Voice and other local tabloids were that Michelle and her
partners allegedly kidnapped 11 children. But in her complaint against the
publisher of The Voice Newspaper, she described herself as “a woman with a big
heart” who went around collecting “21 street children” for care.
She
is currently being probed by an investigating magistrate in Bamenda. She also
stated in her complaint that with the help of some authorities notably the
commissioner of immigration and the delegate of women’s affairs, they were
already identifying the parents of the kids to return them home. She also
claims that some men took one of the kids to Wum and were arrested for
kidnapping.
Even
so, the lady banker went ahead to complain against The Eye for alleged
defamation despite the fact that the court is still examining her and others on
the offence of kidnapping children – which she is struggling to deny.
Street children or children on the street?
Children
on the street are not street children. Street children are those living on the
streets also known as Nanga Nbokos. Contrarily, children in the street have
defined homes from where they sneak out to town early morning, without the
knowledge of their parents, do their odd jobs and go back home at night. So
there is a clear difference between street children and children on the street.
So,
whoever claims she or he is caring for street children in Bamenda must sure
have a tough time proving such. That person must also explain why she would
keep children in a room with iron protectors on the windows yet without louvres
or shutters! How did the children cope with the cold nights, with an unlocked
window?
And for the pastor who owned the building,
how could he allow human beings to be kept in such prison-like conditions?
Instead of providing regular beds for the kids, the latter slept on two broken
refrigerators. At their second location at Metta Quarter, they had dirty
mattresses on the bear floor of a nasty room. The question is this that “is
this the succor a woman with a “Big Heart” should provide for street kids?”
Rapid intervention
Meanwhile,
gallant police officers of the Mobile Intervention Unit, GMI had arrested
Michelle Dienne last year for kidnapping several children. Despite police
regulations and ethics, the commissioner of Emi-Immigration,
EbakoNtohManyiepouseTambe intervened and released Michelle. She also bailed two
others – Abong Judith Bih, former regional delegate of women’s affairs and a
certain Philemon Fouabou who was found guarding two of the child captives in a
house behind Christal Hotel at Metta Quarter.
The
lady commissioner took the undertaking to produce the suspects anytime need be.
Now
though, Michelle Diene must prove that she was qualified to host street
children, even in a region where, according to the ministry of social affairs
street children do not exist. Perhaps to help her case she could simply produce
an authorization from the ministry of Social Affairs empowering her to carter
for street children.
In
fact, to become a partner with the ministry of social affairs one must apply to
the divisional delegation of social affairs for an authorization to create a
probation home. The ministry is actually encouraging individuals and families
to take up this kind of activity according to their means.
Nevertheless,
it emerged that Michelle actually identified herself at the delegation of
Social Affairs as a philanthropist funded by the church. But it is not proven if she ever obtained an
authorization?
Shaken
by the kidnap scandal that went viral on the internet, the new minister of
social affairs has waded in, officially instructing the regional delegate of
social affairs to investigate and report back to her on this jig saw story.
Another
puzzling question is how did the then Delegate of Women’s Affairs and the
Family, Abong Judith, get entangled in this palaver, whereas her ministry has
no business with street children? Mrs. Abong is now telling whoever wants to
listen that she is not an insider in the street children kidnap affair but had
merely met them as a resource person.
The
rescued kids however identified her as well as the commissioner of immigration
and banker Michelle saying all three women used to visit them at the warehouse
where they were held behind bars.
Michelle claims she was taking care of
street children, but did she have the technical qualification to manage
socially maladjusted children? Does the ministry of social affair issue
authorizations to individuals for this activity? The answer is a fat no!
Individuals can only obtain authorization to manage little children – that is
to run orphanages. And in this case, little children are those aged 0-3 years.
Besides
there are only four centres for socially maladjusted children in the whole
country located in Betamba in the East Region; Maroua in the Far North; Bostal
Institute in Buea and Home Atelier in the Littoral.
What’s
more such institutions must be properly equipped and staffed with social workers
and technicians qualified to handle socially maladjusted children. They would
include teachers, nurses, physiotherapists, and physical education experts. Did
the Bamenda ladies fulfill these conditions?
(Check
out the prime minister’s decree No 200/110/PM of March 2001 on the organization
and functioning of government institutions catering for young children (day
care centres).
No comments:
Post a Comment