Law suit against mobile phone operators is
inevitable
By Chief Charles Taku, Saturday, January
21, 2017
MTN Cameroon CEO, PhilisiweSibiya |
I listened to the interview in which an MTN
official in South Africa attempted to explain and justify the contractual basis
on which it terminated or suspended indefinitely internet services in the
Southern Cameroons. The problem is that the so-called national security threat
clause alleged by Republique du Cameroun to request the cooperation of MTN in
its ongoing criminal actions that have led to loss of life in the occupied
territory pertains to a situation where a state of public emergency is legally
justified and declared.
Even
in such circumstances, MTN would have been required sufficient guarantees of
the non-derogation of certain International Treaty protected human rights like
the right to life as a condition to acceding the impugned request. There is in
this situation, no legal or constitutional authority to justify the actions of
the MTN in acceding to a request that has facilitated the commission of crimes
against humanity or a widespread and systemic basis without such guarantees.
Apart
from their contract with the government of Cameroun, their operations are
regulated by international treaties which as a state party, Cameroun must
respect. The collective nature of the impugned crimes is a violation of
international law. There ought to have been an arbitration clause in the MTN
contract with Cameroun which MTN would have invoked to protect their clients,
ensure that its involvement doesn’t go beyond their contractual obligations and
are within international law.
The
fact that their actions are facilitating the perpetration of crimes which they
acknowledged in the interview and with its knowledge is a source of great concern.
There is no indication that it has taken measures to protest these violations
to Cameroun. MTN should have protested and/or insisted that Cameroun notifies
the International Telecommunication Union of its actions and get assurances
that the intended actions to abate the so-called national security threats were
neither disproportionate or abused to commit international crimes.
It
would appear such guarantees were neither sought and obtained prior to MTN
taking action that have facilitated the perpetration of international crimes
against Southern Cameroonians. The responsibility of the MTN is thus not based
on the alleged compliance with the contract it has with Republique du Cameroun,
but its inability to obtain verifiable guarantees that the purported national
security clause was not used to perpetrate egregious violations and crimes of a
collective and grave nature.
MECHANISMS FOR REDRESS
Now,
very urgent complaints should be filed against the telephone operators jointly
with La Republique du Cameroun for conspiracy and complicity in the crimes
against humanity and genocide in the Southern Cameroons to the International
Telecommunication Union in Geneva for the breach of the International
Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs) Treaty which La Republique ratified
18/4/95.
La
Republique is a state party of the International Communications Union since
1960. The same complaints must also be filed as criminal complaints in the
respective countries where the telephone operators are domiciled and at all
international criminal and human rights courts or commissions. Class actions
should be contemplated in the USA Courts against these telephone operators and
La Republique and potentially in the countries in which they are domiciled.
The crimes are:
1) Crimes against humanity of murder and
complicity and /or conspiracy to murder, torture, complicity and /or conspiracy
in torture, collective punishment and conspiracy and or complicity in
collective punishment, acts of terror, complicity and or conspiracy in the
perpetration of the acts of terror, rape as a crime against humanity,
indignities and other inhumane acts against a civilian population on
discriminatory grounds due to their Southern Cameroons nationality.
2) Genocide and violation of article 9 of
the genocide convention 1949.
3) The use of the military tribunal process
to try civilians in violation of international law.
4) The massive arrest, abductions and
deportation of Southern Cameroonians to concentration camps, military and
paramilitary institutions in la Republique du Cameroun.
5) Cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.
The
telephone operators with the exception of CAMTEL have willingly and
substantially contributed to the perpetration of these crimes by La Republique
du Cameroun by facilitating the collective punishment and the perpetration of
the underlying crimes against the population of the Southern Cameroons and in
the absence of military necessity in times of war duly declared pursuant to the
laws and customs of war, a civilian population clamoring for respect of
international law, an end of military occupation and the respect of
international protected civil and political rights and civil liberties, human
dignity and security of persons and sanctity of human life within their territory.
All
Cameroonians worldwide should extend our protest actions to filing complaints
well supported by evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment